Dining table 2. Portion of Users Desiring For each Future Relationships State by the Sex
Lastly, all of our data advise that FWB partners don’t possess uniform criterion for the future of their dating. Every test hoped that relationship manage possibly stay a similar (39%) or turn into a partnership (38%), that have a lot fewer assured that they create end up being “only nearest and dearest” (17%) otherwise discontinue the relationship completely (6%).
We then examined whether people’s future expectations for their FWB relationship depended on their sex. To do so, we submitted the dichotomous future expectations variable we created (coded as either stay the same or change) to a chi-square analysis. Consistent with hypotheses, men and women differed in their expectations for how their FWB relationship will evolve over time, ? 2 (1, N = 367) = , p < .001. Specifically, women (69%) were more likely than men (40%) to hope that their FWB transitions in the future into a full-fledged romance, a basic friendship, or no relationship at all. By contrast, men (60%) were more likely than women (31%) to desire that their relationship stay the same over time.
We also conducted separate analyses to determine whether this sex difference holds for each of the specific relational end-states assessed (i.e., romantic relationship, friendship, or no relationship at all). Thus, we computed three e versus romantic relationship, (b) stay the same versus friendship, and (3) stay the same versus no relationship. These new variables were submitted to chi-square analyses. Consistent with the preceding results, women were significantly more likely than men to desire a shift to a romantic relationship, ? 2 (1, N = 281) = , p < .001; as well as a friendship, ? 2 (1, N = 207) = , p < .001. There was not a significant sex difference in desire to end the relationship, ? 2 (1, N = 163) = 1.16, ns, perhaps because so few participants of both sexes (approximately 6% each) selected this as an option. The exact percentage of men and women desiring each future relationship state can be seen in Table 2.
Ancillary Analyses
I repeated every early in the day analyses dealing with for market situations, including intimate positioning (heterosexual against. Okumaya devam et “Dining table 2. Portion of Users Desiring For each Future Relationships State by the Sex”